When the signs on the freeway and at train stations are directing you to a conference, then it must be big, and Intergeo certainly is. Intergeo is billed as the world’s biggest trade fair for geodesy, geoinformation and land management and is the premier geospatial conference for Germany. There were over 500 exhibitors at the trade show with over 17,500 visitors. Now that’s big. In addition, 1,500 people attended the conference.
I came to see what 500 exhibitors of geospatial related services and technologies would look like and was impressed by the variety of offerings. There were three themes that stood out to me: 3D visualisation, data collection vehicles and open GIS.
When I look at a map of London, I not only see a monopoly board with places like Euston Station, Mayfair, Kings Cross, Marylebone etc; I also see my city, Melbourne in a parallel universe. Here are Camberwell, Kensington, Sydenham and Epping, suburbs of Melbourne. Obviously, there are many parallels in the UK and Australia, no less in the spatial industry.
I am attending the Association for Geographic Information (AGI) GeoCommunity '11 conference in Nottingham. That’s right, place of the Sheriff of Nottingham and Robin Hood fame. AGI is the UK equivalent of the Survey & Spatial Sciences Institute (SSSI), and the annual conference is the largest independent GI conference in the UK. GI refers to Geographic Information, however as one speaker pointed today, across the industry there are a range of terms used: Spatial Information, Geospatial, GIS pronounced various ways, and Location intelligence etc. And we wonder why people are confused about our industry...
In 2002, Spatial Vision completed the first GIS Benchmark Survey of Water Authorities in Victoria. Spatial Vision has since followed this up with national surveys in 2006 and 2009. The purpose for the surveys is to enable each authority to benchmark their operational deployment of this technology against their industry counterparts.
Water authorities first started using GIS or spatial information technologies in the early 1980s. However, as evident by Google Earth, the technology has rapidly evolved in recent years and become far more accessible. By 2009, 100% of authorities surveyed operated web-based spatial systems available enterprise-wide, a huge shift from 40% in 2002.
What are Web 2.0, Science 2.0 and Government 2.0 and why do they matter?
The web is firmly embedded in our lives. My teenage kids don’t know, and wouldn’t know life without it. My wife, kids and my mother, who is 80, all have Facebook pages. I can’t imagine how bored my kids would be if the web suddenly reverted back to static html pages, as it was not many years ago. The web has evolved from a place to find information to a place to hang out with friends.
The term Web 2.0 is used to describe a set of cumulative technologies that software developers could use to build applications that enabled everyone to build their own websites, to interact with applications and with each other . For this reason, Web 2.0 is also termed the ‘social network web’. The web is now actively used by every day people to collect and share information.
So what is Web 3.0? I’ve just attended, I should say was ‘engaged’ in the ‘Web 3.0 and the Future of Social Media’ conference in Sydney to find out. Engaged was the most overused word over the two days. However, you can’t escape the fact that ‘social engagement’ is the biggest thing going in the web and is central to its future. As noted by one speaker, the term ‘social media on the web’ is fast becoming redundant as the web is becoming synonymous with ‘social’. Whereas in 2008 mobile phones were the platform of choice for keeping up social interaction by calls and text etc, in 2009, Internet social networks have become the main way for people to connect with each other. (Mark Higginson, The Neilsen Company)
The name WhereCamp raised more questions than answers when I knew there was going to be one in Madison, following from the NACIS conference. As I discovered a WhereCamp is an 'unconference': a user-generated conference covering topics only relevant to the attendees.
The format went something like this: